With the emergence of new business models, it seems that 2.0 VCs have changed their criteria for investment choices: we must now focus on products known as "disruptive." In other words, on services or products that have the potential to upset the dominant economic sectors.
I listed the main parameters of change and investment for all startups today:
- Disruptive Rule 1
Before: barriers to entry must be very high to finance your company
Today this is no longer a criterion, more barriers to entry are low, the faster the product can be active. - Disruptive Rule 2
Front: When do you break even or positive?
Today: we do not care, only the speed of propagation among users and the disruptive effect on the market are the criteria. - Disruptive Rule 3
Before: The management in question? to invest in your company, you need big names to the board, the PhD, etc. ...
Today: no matter the management, the founders and leaders must be "Hypes". Ex: Being former CEO of Kazaa or Napster. - Disruptive Rule 4
Before: What about patents, you are sure your product is well protected?
Today: a bit of tinkering, a free open source products "third party" and voila.
Ex: FON.Provided that either distruptif!
Despite a mildly provocative 
These concepts are investment and will make the success or major flop tomorrow!
